linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] futex: Avoid taking hb lock if nothing to wakeup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1389464504.21727.44.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 10:21:44 -0800
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
	dvhart@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	efault@....de, jeffm@...e.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	jason.low2@...com, Waiman.Long@...com, tom.vaden@...com,
	scott.norton@...com, aswin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] futex: Avoid taking hb lock if nothing to wakeup

On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 01:52 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[...]
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 01:49:12AM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:05:20AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > -	spin_lock(&hb->lock);
> > > +	spin_lock(&hb->lock); /* implies MB (A) */
> > 
> > You need smp_mb__before_spinlock() before the spin_lock() to get a
> > full memory barrier.

Hmmm, the thing we need to guarantee here is that the ticket increment
is visible (which is the same as the smp_mb__after_atomic_inc we used to
have in the original atomic counter approach), so adding a barrier
before the spin_lock call wouldn't serve that. I previously consulted
this with Linus and we can rely on the fact that spin_lock calls already
update the head counter, so spinners are visible even if the lock hasn't
been acquired yet.

> Actually, even that only gets you smp_mb().

I guess you mean smp_wmb() here.

> Unless you are ordering a prior write against a later write here, you
> will need an smp_mb().

Yep.

Thanks for looking into this,
Davidlohr

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/