| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140111185110.GB3257@mtj.dyndns.org> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:51:10 -0500 From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com, heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, JBottomley@...allels.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal Hey, Alan. On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:46:10AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote: > The SUBJECT lines in your patch emails don't mention the version > number. That is, they just say "[PATCH]", not "[PATCH v2]" or "[PATCH > v3]". This makes it very difficult for me to tell which messages to > read. Hmm... they're all threaded. I add version tags when posting incremental patches but usually don't bother with it when posting a new version of the whole series. After all, some patches are get updated without explicitly given a new version for refrehses and stuff so it's not like you can determine everything based on subjects only. > (Reading them in order doesn't work, because my computer mixes up the > order of messages when it downloads a large bunch from the email > server. It's kind of annoying...) And they aren't threaded? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists