[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140110171108.32b2be171cd5e54bf22fb2a4@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 17:11:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Linux-MM'" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, hughd@...gle.com,
"'Minchan Kim'" <minchan@...nel.org>, shli@...ionio.com,
"'Bob Liu'" <bob.liu@...cle.com>, k.kozlowski@...sung.com,
stable@...r.kernel.org, weijie.yang.kh@...il.com,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/swap: fix race on swap_info reuse between swapoff
and swapon
On Thu, 09 Jan 2014 13:39:55 +0800 Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com> wrote:
> swapoff clear swap_info's SWP_USED flag prematurely and free its resources
> after that. A concurrent swapon will reuse this swap_info while its previous
> resources are not cleared completely.
>
> These late freed resources are:
> - p->percpu_cluster
> - swap_cgroup_ctrl[type]
> - block_device setting
> - inode->i_flags &= ~S_SWAPFILE
>
> This patch clear SWP_USED flag after all its resources freed, so that swapon
> can reuse this swap_info by alloc_swap_info() safely.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/mm/swapfile.c
> +++ b/mm/swapfile.c
> @@ -1922,7 +1922,6 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> p->swap_map = NULL;
> cluster_info = p->cluster_info;
> p->cluster_info = NULL;
> - p->flags = 0;
> frontswap_map = frontswap_map_get(p);
> spin_unlock(&p->lock);
> spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> @@ -1948,6 +1947,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE1(swapoff, const char __user *, specialfile)
> mutex_unlock(&inode->i_mutex);
> }
> filp_close(swap_file, NULL);
> +
> + /*
> + * clear SWP_USED flag after all resources freed
> + * so that swapon can reuse this swap_info in alloc_swap_info() safely
> + * it is ok to not hold p->lock after we cleared its SWP_WRITEOK
> + */
> + spin_lock(&swap_lock);
> + p->flags = 0;
> + spin_unlock(&swap_lock);
> +
> err = 0;
> atomic_inc(&proc_poll_event);
> wake_up_interruptible(&proc_poll_wait);
I didn't look too closely, but this patch might also address the race
which Krzysztof addressed with
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/swap-fix-setting-page_size-blocksize-during-swapoff-swapon-race.patch.
Can we please check that out?
I do prefer fixing all these swapon-vs-swapoff races with some large,
simple, wide-scope exclusion scheme. Perhaps SWP_USED is that scheme.
An alternative would be to add another mutex and just make sys_swapon()
and sys_swapoff() 100% exclusive. But that is plastering yet another
lock over this mess to hide the horrors which lurk within :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists