[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389470568.2537.81.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 12:02:48 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, andreas.dilger@...el.com,
peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com, tao.peng@....com,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: lustre: Use of fls to find last set bit
On Sun, 2014-01-12 at 01:02 +0530, Monam Agarwal wrote:
> This introduces fls in lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
> to find the last set bit.
[]
> Signed-off-by: Monam Agarwal <monamagarwal123@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes since v1:
> *Incorrect commit message
> *Use of fls function
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
[]
> @@ -150,10 +150,12 @@ struct ldlm_interval *ldlm_interval_detach(struct ldlm_lock *l)
> static inline int lock_mode_to_index(ldlm_mode_t mode)
> {
> int index;
> + int len;
>
> LASSERT(mode != 0);
> LASSERT(IS_PO2(mode));
> - for (index = -1; mode; index++, mode >>= 1) ;
> + len = fls(mode);
> + index = len-1;
There's no need for len at all.
index = fls(mode) - 1;
would be fine.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists