linux-kernel - Re: [char-misc 1/4] mei: do not run reset flow from the interrupt thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140111233848.GB6819@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 15:38:48 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Winkler, Tomas" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>
Cc:	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Usyskin, Alexander" <alexander.usyskin@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [char-misc 1/4] mei: do not run reset flow from the interrupt
 thread

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:46:14PM +0000, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> 
> 
> > 
> > This is a _really_ big patch for a stable kernel tree.  Are you sure
> > it's needed there?  Please go read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> > again.
> 
> I understand it's big though currently I do not have significantly
> simpler fix for the issue, all 4 patches are needed to make the reset
> issue  go away.

What is the "reset issue"?  Who is it affecting?  What is the problem?
Is there a work-around without this patchset?

As it is, I can't take something this big for the stable tree, sorry.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/