lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 11:30:22 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf: add %pT format specifier

Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-01-11 at 10:59 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> > I just added noinline_for_stack as with other functions does.
> > But indeed, stack used by name[] is only 16 bytes but stack used by function
> > arguments are larger than 16 bytes. We should remove noinline_for_stack ?
> My recollection is that certain gcc versions don't do
> well with multiple inline functions that have stack
> variables.
> Instead of collapsing the variables, gcc will
> accumulate the stack depth of all the inlines
> args instead of reusing the stack.

I tried what commit cf3b429b "vsprintf.c: use noinline_for_stack" says
using gcc 4.4.7, but it made no difference for stack usage.
Thus, it seems harmless to keep noinline_for_stack keyword.
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists