[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140110160430.526efb3ea91783fe8a32fec5@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:04:30 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: pavel@....cz, joe@...ches.com, keescook@...omium.org,
geert@...ux-m68k.org, jkosina@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/vsprintf: add %pT format specifier
On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:52:00 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> This patch introduces %pT format specifier for printing task_struct->comm.
> Currently %pT does not provide consistency. I'm planning to change to use RCU
> in the future. By using RCU, the comm name read from task_struct->comm will be
> guaranteed to be consistent. But before modifying set_task_comm() to use RCU,
> we need to kill direct ->comm users who do not use get_task_comm().
On reflection...
It isn't obvious that this patch is sufficiently beneficial until we
have that RCU code in place.
So I could retain this patch in -mm until we have that all sorted out.
And I'll have to avoid merging %pT users into mainline in the
meanwhile!
Am I wrong? The patch seems fairly pointless as a standalone thing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists