[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140111073724.GA10038@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:37:24 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
dvhart@...ux.intel.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
efault@....de, jeffm@...e.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
jason.low2@...com, Waiman.Long@...com, tom.vaden@...com,
scott.norton@...com, aswin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] futex: Larger hash table
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 07:05:18AM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> From: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
>
> Currently, the futex global hash table suffers from it's fixed, smallish
> (for today's standards) size of 256 entries, as well as its lack of NUMA
> awareness. Large systems, using many futexes, can be prone to high amounts
> of collisions; where these futexes hash to the same bucket and lead to
> extra contention on the same hb->lock. Furthermore, cacheline bouncing is a
> reality when we have multiple hb->locks residing on the same cacheline and
> different futexes hash to adjacent buckets.
>
> This patch keeps the current static size of 16 entries for small systems,
> or otherwise, 256 * ncpus (or larger as we need to round the number to a
> power of 2). Note that this number of CPUs accounts for all CPUs that can
> ever be available in the system, taking into consideration things like
> hotpluging. While we do impose extra overhead at bootup by making the hash
> table larger, this is a one time thing, and does not shadow the benefits
> of this patch.
>
> Furthermore, as suggested by tglx, by cache aligning the hash buckets we can
> avoid access across cacheline boundaries and also avoid massive cache line
> bouncing if multiple cpus are hammering away at different hash buckets which
> happen to reside in the same cache line.
>
> Also, similar to other core kernel components (pid, dcache, tcp), by using
> alloc_large_system_hash() we benefit from its NUMA awareness and thus the
> table is distributed among the nodes instead of in a single one.
>
> For a custom microbenchmark that pounds on the uaddr hashing -- making the wait
> path fail at futex_wait_setup() returning -EWOULDBLOCK for large amounts of
> futexes, we can see the following benefits on a 80-core, 8-socket 1Tb server:
>
> +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
> | threads | baseline (ops/sec) | aligned-only (ops/sec) | large table (ops/sec) | large table+aligned (ops/sec) |
> +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
> | 512 | 32426 | 50531 (+55.8%) | 255274 (+687.2%) | 292553 (+802.2%) |
> | 256 | 65360 | 99588 (+52.3%) | 443563 (+578.6%) | 508088 (+677.3%) |
> | 128 | 125635 | 200075 (+59.2%) | 742613 (+491.1%) | 835452 (+564.9%) |
> | 80 | 193559 | 323425 (+67.1%) | 1028147 (+431.1%) | 1130304 (+483.9%) |
> | 64 | 247667 | 443740 (+79.1%) | 997300 (+302.6%) | 1145494 (+362.5%) |
> | 32 | 628412 | 721401 (+14.7%) | 965996 (+53.7%) | 1122115 (+78.5%) |
> +---------+--------------------+------------------------+-----------------------+-------------------------------+
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
> Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Scott Norton <scott.norton@...com>
> Cc: Tom Vaden <tom.vaden@...com>
> Cc: Aswin Chandramouleeswaran <aswin@...com>
> Reviewed-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/futex.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
> index 085f5fa..577481d 100644
> --- a/kernel/futex.c
> +++ b/kernel/futex.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched/rt.h>
> #include <linux/hugetlb.h>
> #include <linux/freezer.h>
> +#include <linux/bootmem.h>
>
> #include <asm/futex.h>
>
> @@ -70,8 +71,6 @@
>
> int __read_mostly futex_cmpxchg_enabled;
>
> -#define FUTEX_HASHBITS (CONFIG_BASE_SMALL ? 4 : 8)
> -
> /*
> * Futex flags used to encode options to functions and preserve them across
> * restarts.
> @@ -149,9 +148,11 @@ static const struct futex_q futex_q_init = {
> struct futex_hash_bucket {
> spinlock_t lock;
> struct plist_head chain;
> -};
> +} ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
>
> -static struct futex_hash_bucket futex_queues[1<<FUTEX_HASHBITS];
> +static unsigned long __read_mostly futex_hashsize;
> +
> +static struct futex_hash_bucket *futex_queues;
>
> /*
> * We hash on the keys returned from get_futex_key (see below).
> @@ -161,7 +162,7 @@ static struct futex_hash_bucket *hash_futex(union futex_key *key)
> u32 hash = jhash2((u32*)&key->both.word,
> (sizeof(key->both.word)+sizeof(key->both.ptr))/4,
> key->both.offset);
> - return &futex_queues[hash & ((1 << FUTEX_HASHBITS)-1)];
> + return &futex_queues[hash & (futex_hashsize - 1)];
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -2719,7 +2720,18 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE6(futex, u32 __user *, uaddr, int, op, u32, val,
> static int __init futex_init(void)
> {
> u32 curval;
> - int i;
> + unsigned long i;
> +
> +#if CONFIG_BASE_SMALL
> + futex_hashsize = 16;
> +#else
> + futex_hashsize = roundup_pow_of_two(256 * num_possible_cpus());
> +#endif
> +
> + futex_queues = alloc_large_system_hash("futex", sizeof(*futex_queues),
> + futex_hashsize, 0,
> + futex_hashsize < 256 ? HASH_SMALL : 0,
> + NULL, NULL, futex_hashsize, futex_hashsize);
>
> /*
> * This will fail and we want it. Some arch implementations do
> @@ -2734,7 +2746,7 @@ static int __init futex_init(void)
> if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, NULL, 0, 0) == -EFAULT)
> futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1;
>
> - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(futex_queues); i++) {
> + for (i = 0; i < futex_hashsize; i++) {
> plist_head_init(&futex_queues[i].chain);
> spin_lock_init(&futex_queues[i].lock);
> }
> --
> 1.8.1.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists