linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v3 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140111001953.GA25593@kroah.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2014 16:19:53 -0800
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core:
 implement synchronous self-removal

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 07:08:56AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 08:57:17AM -0500, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > This is v3 of kernfs self-removal patchset.  v2 posting mistakenly
> > sent out slightly old set of patches, so the v3.  Sorry about the
> > noise.  Changes from the first take[L] are,
> 
> It's really late in the -rc cycle for me to take this for 3.14, but I
> see patch 1 is a good one to have, so I'll take that now, and queue the
> rest up for after 3.14-rc1 is out for 3.15.  Is that ok with you, or do
> you have patches that depend on this series for 3.14?

Oh nevermind, these are all good, now applied :)

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/