linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/5] mm: vmscan: respect NUMA policy mask when shrinking slab on direct reclaim

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a39e4c57c5a8db4d6e5bb8cd070ac807c8c6fce8.1389443272.git.vdavydov@parallels.com>
Date:	Sat, 11 Jan 2014 16:36:33 +0400
From:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<devel@...nvz.org>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] mm: vmscan: respect NUMA policy mask when shrinking slab on direct reclaim

When direct reclaim is executed by a process bound to a set of NUMA
nodes, we should scan only those nodes when possible, but currently we
will scan kmem from all online nodes even if the kmem shrinker is NUMA
aware. That said, binding a process to a particular NUMA node won't
prevent it from shrinking inode/dentry caches from other nodes, which is
not good. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...il.com>
---
 mm/vmscan.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index adc3ecb..ae6518d 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2425,8 +2425,8 @@ static unsigned long do_try_to_free_pages(struct zonelist *zonelist,
 			unsigned long lru_pages = 0;
 
 			nodes_clear(shrink->nodes_to_scan);
-			for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z, zonelist,
-					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask)) {
+			for_each_zone_zonelist_nodemask(zone, z, zonelist,
+					gfp_zone(sc->gfp_mask), sc->nodemask) {
 				if (!cpuset_zone_allowed_hardwall(zone, GFP_KERNEL))
 					continue;
 
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/