[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389549018-1249-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:50:18 -0500
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86: don't use module_init in non-modular intel_mid_vrtc.c
The X86_INTEL_MID option is bool, and hence this code is either
present or absent. It will never be modular, so using
module_init as an alias for __initcall is rather misleading.
Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.
Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
diff --git a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c
index 4762cff7facd..d79e79a232fa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/intel_mid_vrtc.c
@@ -173,5 +173,4 @@ static int __init intel_mid_device_create(void)
return platform_device_register(&vrtc_device);
}
-
-module_init(intel_mid_device_create);
+device_initcall(intel_mid_device_create);
--
1.8.5.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists