[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D30BF7.90107@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 21:41:11 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Ivaylo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>,
Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>
CC: pali.rohar@...il.com, pavel@....cz, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: tsl2563: Initialize channels
On 12/01/14 21:08, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote:
> On 12.01.2014 22:55, Peter Meerwald wrote:
>>
>> I think the fix should rather be
>>
>> if (chan->channel2 == IIO_MOD_LIGHT_BOTH)
>> chip->calib0 = calib_from_sysfs(val);
>> else if (chan->channel2 == IIO_MOD_LIGHT_IR)
>> chip->calib1 = calib_from_sysfs(val);
>> else
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> since only the INTENSITY channels have a CALIBSCALE info
>>
>> the light channel incorrectly sets .indexed = 1 and .channel = 0 which
>> should be unnecessary since there is only one IIO_LIGHT channel
>>
>> regards, p.
>>
>
> I thought so when I was preparing the patch, but unfortunately couldn't find any documentation for iio subsystem structs and defines, besides what is in the header files (and it is not very descriptive), so I took the easy route.
>
> However, I'll send a new patch with the above (and a little more) changes.
Leave the indexed bit alone. Whilst unnecessary it is fine within the ABI
and changing it would be a userspace ABI change.
Otherwise, as described by Peter will be fine.
Jonathan
>
> Thanks,
> Ivo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists