[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2133074.4EFCIDJZXE@avalon>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 23:04:56 +0100
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...ts.codethink.co.uk,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] power: clock_ops.c: fixup clk prepare/unprepare count
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:05:38 Ben Dooks wrote:
> The drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c file is causing warnings from
> the clock driver (as shown below) due to failing to do a clk_prepare()
> call before enabling a clock. It also fails to check the balance of
> prepare/unprepare as __pm_clk_remove() do clk_disable_unprepare() call.
>
> This bug has probably been in since commit b2476490e ("clk: introduce
> the common clock framework") as the warning was part of the original
> commit. It is strange that it has not been noticed (although this has
> also been coupled with a failure for certain SH builds to not build the
> necessary glue to use this method of controlling the clocks).
>
> In summary, this is probably needed in several stable branches but need
> advice on which ones.
>
> On the Renesas Lager board, this causes numerous warnings of the following
> and even worse the clock system will not enable clocks, causing drivers
> that are in development to fail to work:
>
> WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/clk/clk.c:883 __clk_enable+0x2c/0xa0()
I've never noticed this on Lager, probably because Lager multiplatform doesn't
make use of clock_ops.c as drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c (which you addressed in
another patch that I've also replied to). I'm thus not sure we need to apply
this as a fix and backport it to stable branches.
> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
> Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Ian Molton <ian.molton@...ethink.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> index 9d8fde7..b9dd8fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/clock_ops.c
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void pm_clk_acquire(struct device *dev, struct
> pm_clock_entry *ce) if (IS_ERR(ce->clk)) {
> ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ERROR;
> } else {
> + clk_prepare(ce->clk);
> ce->status = PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED;
> dev_dbg(dev, "Clock %s managed by runtime PM.\n", ce->con_id);
> }
> @@ -99,10 +100,12 @@ static void __pm_clk_remove(struct pm_clock_entry *ce)
>
> if (ce->status < PCE_STATUS_ERROR) {
> if (ce->status == PCE_STATUS_ENABLED)
> - clk_disable_unprepare(ce->clk);
> + clk_disable(ce->clk);
>
> - if (ce->status >= PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED)
> + if (ce->status >= PCE_STATUS_ACQUIRED) {
> + clk_unprepare(ce->clk);
> clk_put(ce->clk);
> + }
> }
>
> kfree(ce->con_id);
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists