[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140112093013.GB3664@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 10:30:13 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, mpx: extend siginfo structure to include bound
violation information
On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 05:20:03PM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
> This patch adds new fields about bound violation into siginfo
> structure. si_lower and si_upper are respectively lower bound
> and upper bound when bound violation is caused.
>
> These fields will be set in #BR exception handler by decoding
> the user instruction and constructing the faulting pointer.
> A userspace application can get violation address, lower bound
> and upper bound for bound violation from this new siginfo structure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/mpx.h | 39 +++++
> arch/x86/kernel/mpx.c | 289 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
This thing looks like a partial duplication of functionality which we
already have - inat.*/insn.*, etc.
It would be cleaner to integrate the mpx pieces into the existing x86
insn analysis code and use it instead of growing your own, IMHO.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists