[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1y52lnyyf.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Sun, 12 Jan 2014 07:53:28 -0500
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagig@...lanox.com>,
"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...erainc.com>,
target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Oren Duer <oren@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/14] target/sbc: Add P_TYPE + PROT_EN bits to READ_CAPACITY_16
>>>>> "Sagi" == Sagi Grimberg <sagig@....mellanox.co.il> writes:
>> Per SBC, PI must be initialized to 0xffffffffffffffff. Since an app
>> tag value of 0xffff is an escape, this will prevent both target and
>> initiator from performing PI-verification when that block is read.
Sagi> OK, so this is an implicit escape (which will become explicit in
Sagi> DIX1.1?). So I will open that in DIF RDMA verbs.
DIX 1.0 says:
"If a storage device returns a value of 0xFFFF in the application tag
and the device is formatted with T10 PI Type 1 or 2 protection, the I/O
controller must disable integrity checking for that sector."
In DIX 1.1 it is explicit by way of the DIX_APP_ESCAPE flag.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists