lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 Jan 2014 14:20:00 +0100
From:	Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@...e.fr>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
	Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/28] drm/i2c: tda998x: move the TBG_CNTRL_0
 register setting

On Sun, 12 Jan 2014 12:31:59 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:

> > So, in my patch 9, I was writing the REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 after writing
> > REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, and you refused it. Here, I write REG_TBG_CNTRL_0
> > after the write of REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 in the HDMI sequence, and you still
> > don't agree.
> > 
> > What is the right way?  
> 
> No, both NAKS are for the exact same issue.
> 
> Patch 9 inserted the write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 after REG_TBG_CNTRL_0.
> Then in this patch you move REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 after all writes.
> 
> Had you appropriately placed the write to REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 in patch 9
> in the first place, _this_ patch (patch 20) would not be required to
> then move REG_TBG_CNTRL_0 after it.  So, fixing patch 9 removes the
> need for patch 20.

Fixing the patch 9 gives:

	/*
	 * Always generate sync polarity relative to input sync and
	 * revert input stage toggled sync at output stage
	 */
	reg = TBG_CNTRL_1_DWIN_DIS | TBG_CNTRL_1_TGL_EN;
	if (adj_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_NHSYNC)
		reg |= TBG_CNTRL_1_H_TGL;
	if (adj_mode->flags & DRM_MODE_FLAG_NVSYNC)
		reg |= TBG_CNTRL_1_V_TGL;
	reg_write(priv, REG_TBG_CNTRL_1, reg);

	/* must be last register set: */
	reg_clear(priv, REG_TBG_CNTRL_0, TBG_CNTRL_0_SYNC_ONCE);

	/* Only setup the info frames if the sink is HDMI */
	if (priv->is_hdmi_sink) {
		/* We need to turn HDMI HDCP stuff on to get audio through */
		reg &= ~TBG_CNTRL_1_DWIN_DIS;
		reg_write(priv, REG_TBG_CNTRL_1, reg);
		reg_write(priv, REG_ENC_CNTRL, ENC_CNTRL_CTL_CODE(1));
		reg_set(priv, REG_TX33, TX33_HDMI);

		tda998x_write_avi(priv, adj_mode);

		if (priv->params.audio_cfg)
			tda998x_configure_audio(priv, adj_mode, &priv->params);
	}

and REG_TBG_CNTRL_1 is set in the HDMI branch (with REG_ENC_CNTRL and
REG_TX33).

Is this OK?

-- 
Ken ar c'hentaƱ	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ