linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] AlarmDev: Changing is_wakeup() to be a function to pass checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAAsK9AEQiAZ+X83x9cnoxKTnsFZvZdg8CQNzd=+UQO_4AZTABQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:33:51 +0100
From:	Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
To:	Joe <cyborg101010@...il.com>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	john.stultz@...aro.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	cruzjbishop@...il.com,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AlarmDev: Changing is_wakeup() to be a function to pass checkpatch

Hello,

2014/1/12 Joe <cyborg101010@...il.com>:
> ---
>  drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c | 10 ++++++----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

You are missing a commit message. Your subject as well looks a bit weird.

>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c b/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> index 647694f..87f2a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> @@ -66,13 +66,15 @@ static struct devalarm alarms[ANDROID_ALARM_TYPE_COUNT];
>   *
>   * Return: 1 if this is a wakeup alarm, otherwise 0
>   */
> -static int is_wakeup(enum android_alarm_type type)
> +static int is_wakeup(enum andriod_alarm_type type)

What is this? andriod? Did it compile?

>  {
> -       return (type == ANDROID_ALARM_RTC_WAKEUP ||
> -               type == ANDROID_ALARM_ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP);
> +       if (type == ANDROID_ALARM_RTC_WAKEUP ||
> +           type == ANDROID_ALARM_ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP)
> +               return 1;
> +       else
> +               return 0;

While this is correct, the better fix would be to remove the parentheses..

Also, I think a similar patch was already applied, not sure though.

> [...]

--
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/