lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D33138.4090903@citrix.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 00:20:08 +0000
From:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To:	Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>,
	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Davies <Jonathan.Davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 8/9] xen-netback: Timeout packets in RX path

On 09/01/14 09:20, Paul Durrant wrote:
>> We are adding the skb to vif->rx_queue even when
>> xenvif_rx_ring_slots_available(vif, min_slots_needed) said there is no
>> space for that. Or am I missing something? Paul?
>>
> That's correct. Part of the flow control improvement was to get rid of needless packet drops. For your purposes, you basically need to avoid using the queuing discipline and take packets into netback's vif->rx_queue regardless of the state of the shared ring so that you can drop them if they get beyond a certain age. So, perhaps you should never stop the netif queue, place an upper limit on vif->rx_queue (either packet or byte count) and drop when that is exceeded (i.e. mimicking pfifo or bfifo internally).
>
How about this:
- when the timer fires first we wake up the thread an tell it to drop 
all the packets in rx_queue
- start_xmit then can drain the qdisc queue into the device queue
- additionally, the RX thread should stop that timer when it was able to 
do some work

Regards,

Zoli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ