[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113080907.GB25466@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:39:07 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blackfin + dmaengine: conflicting define/enum "DMA_COMPLETE"
On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 10:31:00AM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 01/11/2014 10:09 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > in current linux-next (and net-next) the compilation of the CAN
> > drivers[1] with ARCH=blackfin fails with:
> >
> >> CC [M] drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.o
> >> In file included from linux/include/linux/netdevice.h:38:0,
> >> from linux/drivers/net/can/c_can/c_can.c:32:
> >> linux/include/linux/dmaengine.h:55:2: error: expected identifier before numeric constant
> >> linux/include/linux/dmaengine.h: In function 'dma_async_is_complete':
> >> linux/include/linux/dmaengine.h:1023:9: error: 'DMA_IN_PROGRESS' undeclared (first use in this function)
> >> linux/include/linux/dmaengine.h:1023:9: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> >
> > There are two locations where DMA_COMPLETE is defined:
> >
> >> arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF547.h:602:#define DMA_COMPLETE 0x8 /* DMA Complete */
> >> arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/include/mach/defBF544.h:622:#define DMA_COMPLETE 0x8 /* DMA Complete */
> >
> > and
> >
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h-enum dma_status {
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h: DMA_COMPLETE,
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h- DMA_IN_PROGRESS,
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h- DMA_PAUSED,
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h- DMA_ERROR,
> >> include/linux/dmaengine.h-};
> >
> > What's the appropriate fix for the problem?
>
> arch/blackfin/mach-bf548/ needs a less generic name for its macro.
Not just these, but looking at the whole file, it needs fix. Names are very
generic here :( and bound to keep colliding with core stuff
--
~Vinod
>
> > Marc
> >
> > [1] Yes, c_can isn't a blackfin driver, but it's the first one in my
> > compile tests and it fails.
> >
>
>
> --
> ~Randy
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dmaengine" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists