lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 20:19:02 +0900 From: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>, Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>, Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> Subject: [PATCH 7/7] zram: remove unnecessary lock read/write lock's performance is really bad compared to mutex_lock in write most workload.(AFAIR, recenlty there were some effort to enhance it but not sure it got merged). Anyway, we don't need such big granuarity read-write lock any more so this patch replaces read/write lock with mutex. CPU 12 iozone -t -T -l 12 -u 12 -r 16K -s 60M -I +Z -V 0 ==Initial write ==Initial write records: 10 records: 10 avg: 516189.16 avg: 839907.96 std: 22486.53 std: 47902.17 max: 546970.60 max: 909910.35 min: 481131.54 min: 751148.38 ==Rewrite ==Rewrite records: 10 records: 10 avg: 509527.98 avg: 1050156.37 std: 45799.94 std: 40695.44 max: 611574.27 max: 1111929.26 min: 443679.95 min: 980409.62 ==Read ==Read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4408624.17 avg: 4472546.76 std: 281152.61 std: 163662.78 max: 4867888.66 max: 4727351.03 min: 4058347.69 min: 4126520.88 ==Re-read ==Re-read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4462147.53 avg: 4363257.75 std: 283546.11 std: 247292.63 max: 4912894.44 max: 4677241.75 min: 4131386.50 min: 4035235.84 ==Reverse Read ==Reverse Read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4565865.97 avg: 4485818.08 std: 313395.63 std: 248470.10 max: 5232749.16 max: 4789749.94 min: 4185809.62 min: 3963081.34 ==Stride read ==Stride read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4515981.80 avg: 4418806.01 std: 211192.32 std: 212837.97 max: 4889287.28 max: 4686967.22 min: 4210362.00 min: 4083041.84 ==Random read ==Random read records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4410525.23 avg: 4387093.18 std: 236693.22 std: 235285.23 max: 4713698.47 max: 4669760.62 min: 4057163.62 min: 3952002.16 ==Mixed workload ==Mixed workload records: 10 records: 10 avg: 243234.25 avg: 2818677.27 std: 28505.07 std: 195569.70 max: 288905.23 max: 3126478.11 min: 212473.16 min: 2484150.69 ==Random write ==Random write records: 10 records: 10 avg: 555887.07 avg: 1053057.79 std: 70841.98 std: 35195.36 max: 683188.28 max: 1096125.73 min: 437299.57 min: 992481.93 ==Pwrite ==Pwrite records: 10 records: 10 avg: 501745.93 avg: 810363.09 std: 16373.54 std: 19245.01 max: 518724.52 max: 833359.70 min: 464208.73 min: 765501.87 ==Pread ==Pread records: 10 records: 10 avg: 4539894.60 avg: 4457680.58 std: 197094.66 std: 188965.60 max: 4877170.38 max: 4689905.53 min: 4226326.03 min: 4095739.72 Read side seem to be a bit slower than old but I believe it's not bad deal if we consider increased performance of write side and code readability. Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org> --- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 17 ++++++++--------- drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h | 4 +--- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c index f1a3c95..011e55d 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c @@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static struct zram_meta *zram_meta_alloc(u64 disksize) } rwlock_init(&meta->tb_lock); + mutex_init(&meta->buffer_lock); return meta; free_table: @@ -412,6 +413,7 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, struct page *page; unsigned char *user_mem, *cmem, *src, *uncmem = NULL; struct zram_meta *meta = zram->meta; + bool locked = false; page = bvec->bv_page; src = meta->compress_buffer; @@ -431,6 +433,8 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, goto out; } + mutex_lock(&meta->buffer_lock); + locked = true; user_mem = kmap_atomic(page); if (is_partial_io(bvec)) { @@ -457,7 +461,6 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, ret = lzo1x_1_compress(uncmem, PAGE_SIZE, src, &clen, meta->compress_workmem); - if (!is_partial_io(bvec)) { kunmap_atomic(user_mem); user_mem = NULL; @@ -514,6 +517,8 @@ static int zram_bvec_write(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, atomic_inc(&zram->stats.good_compress); out: + if (locked) + mutex_unlock(&meta->buffer_lock); if (is_partial_io(bvec)) kfree(uncmem); @@ -527,15 +532,10 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index, { int ret; - if (rw == READ) { - down_read(&zram->lock); + if (rw == READ) ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio); - up_read(&zram->lock); - } else { - down_write(&zram->lock); + else ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset); - up_write(&zram->lock); - } return ret; } @@ -808,7 +808,6 @@ static int create_device(struct zram *zram, int device_id) { int ret = -ENOMEM; - init_rwsem(&zram->lock); init_rwsem(&zram->init_lock); zram->queue = blk_alloc_queue(GFP_KERNEL); diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h index d876300..ad8aa35 100644 --- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h +++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.h @@ -88,13 +88,11 @@ struct zram_meta { void *compress_buffer; struct table *table; struct zs_pool *mem_pool; + struct mutex buffer_lock; /* protect compress buffers */ }; struct zram { struct zram_meta *meta; - struct rw_semaphore lock; /* protect compression buffers, - * reads and writes - */ struct request_queue *queue; struct gendisk *disk; int init_done; -- 1.8.4.3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists