linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] nfs: don't update isize when NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING in nfs_update

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <C689DB34-AC0A-49CF-94DC-74ACB1CB177F@primarydata.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 08:34:54 -0500
From:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>
To:	shaobingqing <shaobingqing@...tor.com.cn>
Cc:	Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: don't update isize when NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING in nfs_update_inode


On Jan 13, 2014, at 2:55, shaobingqing <shaobingqing@...tor.com.cn> wrote:

> When a file is in NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITING status, its isize perhaps has not been 
> transferred to the metadate server. So the isize getting from the metadata server
> perhaps is out of date and cannot be used to update the isize of the client.
> 
> Signed-off-by: shaobingqing <shaobingqing@...tor.com.cn>
> ---
> fs/nfs/inode.c |    3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index ebeb94c..caf50a1 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -1402,7 +1402,8 @@ static int nfs_update_inode(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fattr)
> 		if (new_isize != cur_isize) {
> 			/* Do we perhaps have any outstanding writes, or has
> 			 * the file grown beyond our last write? */
> -			if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags)) ||
> +			if ((nfsi->npages == 0 && !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT, &nfsi->flags) &&
> +			     !test_bit(NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMITTING, &nfsi->flags)) ||
> 			     new_isize > cur_isize) {
> 				i_size_write(inode, new_isize);
> 				invalid |= NFS_INO_INVALID_ATTR|NFS_INO_INVALID_DATA;

Ugh. Is there any reason why we can’t just keep NFS_INO_LAYOUTCOMMIT set until the layout commit operation is finished instead of multiplying the tests for it in generic NFS code paths such as nfs_update_inode?

--
Trond Myklebust
Linux NFS client maintainer

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/