linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D40957.2020103@sr71.net>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 07:42:15 -0800
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
CC:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] re-shrink 'struct page' when SLUB is on.

On 01/13/2014 05:46 AM, Fengguang Wu wrote:
>>> So, I think
>>> that it is better to get more benchmark results to this patchset for convincing
>>> ourselves. If possible, how about asking Fengguang to run whole set of
>>> his benchmarks before going forward?
>>
>> Cc'ing him.
> 
> My pleasure. Is there a git tree for the patches? Git trees
> are most convenient for running automated tests and bisects.

Here's a branch:

https://github.com/hansendc/linux/tree/slub-reshrink-for-Fengguang-20140113

My patches are not broken out in there, but that's all the code that
needs to get tested.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/