[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113155034.GA10355@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:50:37 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.jf.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/4] perf: IRQ-bound performance events
On Sat, Jan 04, 2014 at 07:22:32PM +0100, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is version 2 of RFC "perf: IRQ-bound performance events". That is an
> introduction of IRQ-bound performance events - ones that only count in a
> context of a hardware interrupt handler. Ingo suggested to extend this
> functionality to softirq and threaded handlers as well:
Hi Alexander,
I still strongly think we should use toggle events to achieve that:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/25/227
This will let us count not just IRQs (-e 'cycles,irq_entry/on=cycles/,irq_exit/off=cycles/') but much more.
The patchset still needs some polishing but I think that's a better diection.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists