[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113191725.GK3256@console-pimps.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:17:25 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] efi: Fix krealloc defect
On Mon, 13 Jan, at 09:47:21AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>
> If it's queued up in some tree of yours, should that
> tree be included in Stephen Rothwell's -next?
My trees get pulled into tip and those are included in linux-next. So,
Borislav's patch is commit ee4114302770 ("x86/efi: Check krealloc return
value") in today's linux-next.
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists