[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140113211055.GB17131@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 13:10:55 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Joe Borg <cyborg101010@...il.com>
Cc: dan.carpenter@...cle.com, abbotti@....co.uk,
hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] AlarmDev: Changing is_wakeup() to be a function to pass
checkpatch
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 08:10:36PM +0000, Joe Borg wrote:
> Signed-off-by Joe Borg <cyborg101010@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c b/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> index 647694f..87f2a02 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c
> @@ -66,13 +66,15 @@ static struct devalarm alarms[ANDROID_ALARM_TYPE_COUNT];
> *
> * Return: 1 if this is a wakeup alarm, otherwise 0
> */
> -static int is_wakeup(enum android_alarm_type type)
> +static int is_wakeup(enum andriod_alarm_type type)
Always build test your patches, this one wasn't.
> {
> - return (type == ANDROID_ALARM_RTC_WAKEUP ||
> - type == ANDROID_ALARM_ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP);
> + if (type == ANDROID_ALARM_RTC_WAKEUP ||
> + type == ANDROID_ALARM_ELAPSED_REALTIME_WAKEUP)
> + return 1;
> + else
> + return 0;
Why are you making this change? There is no logic change here at all.
> }
>
> -
Why remove this line?
Again, you are going to need changelog comments for any patch, please
redo them properly if you wish us to accept your patches.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists