linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHSET v3 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core: implement synchronous self-removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140113225430.GB10124@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 17:54:30 -0500
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
	JBottomley@...allels.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3 driver-core-next] kernfs, sysfs, driver-core:
 implement synchronous self-removal

Hello, Greg.

On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 02:50:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> No worries, but it is sad, I really liked seeing that odd "remove self"
> function go away.  I've now reverted all 15 patches, please verify that

Oh, I'll repost it and it's probably gonna be about the same as my
initial posting which was simpler and actually reduced LOC.  I just
wanna make sure cgroup conversion works fully before reposting it.  I
think it should but I've been wrong a couple times already, so...

> I didn't mess anything up in my tree somehow.

diff'ed before & after and the only difference is the new component
thing, so it looks all good to me.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/