linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: nobootmem: avoid type warning about alignment value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 15:31:28 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Cc:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: nobootmem: avoid type warning about alignment value

On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:27:44 -0500 Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:

> > It seems to me to be absolutely silly to have code introduce a warning
> > yet push the fix for the warning via a completely different tree...
> > 
> I mixed it up. Sorry. Some how I thought there was some other build
> configuration thrown the same warning with memblock series and hence
> suggested the patch to go via Andrew's tree.

Yes, I too had assumed that the warning was caused by the bootmem
patches in -mm.

But it in fact occurs in Linus's current tree.  I'll drop
mm-arm-fix-arms-__ffs-to-conform-to-avoid-warning-with-no_bootmem.patch
and I'll assume that rmk will fix this up at an appropriate time.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/