[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D479AF.3010302@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:41:35 -0500
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: nobootmem: avoid type warning about alignment value
On Monday 13 January 2014 06:33 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 03:31:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 09:27:44 -0500 Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com> wrote:
>>
>>>> It seems to me to be absolutely silly to have code introduce a warning
>>>> yet push the fix for the warning via a completely different tree...
>>>>
>>> I mixed it up. Sorry. Some how I thought there was some other build
>>> configuration thrown the same warning with memblock series and hence
>>> suggested the patch to go via Andrew's tree.
>>
>> Yes, I too had assumed that the warning was caused by the bootmem
>> patches in -mm.
>>
>> But it in fact occurs in Linus's current tree. I'll drop
>> mm-arm-fix-arms-__ffs-to-conform-to-avoid-warning-with-no_bootmem.patch
>> and I'll assume that rmk will fix this up at an appropriate time.
>
> Thanks. I'll apply my version and then I can pull Santosh's nobootmem
> changes (which I've had a couple of times already) without adding to
> the warnings.
>
Thanks Andrew and Russell for sorting out the patch queue.
Regards,
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists