linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/62] 3.10.27-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:12:16 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	"shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 00/62] 3.10.27-stable review

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:30:35PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 01/13/2014 05:26 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.10.27 release.
> >There are 62 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> >to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> >let me know.
> >
> >Responses should be made by Thu Jan 16 00:26:56 UTC 2014.
> >Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >	kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.10.27-rc1.gz
> >and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> >thanks,
> >
> >greg k-h
> >
> 
> Patch testing - passed
> Compile testing - passed
> Boot testing - passed
> dmesg regression testing - passed
> 
> Test systems
> 
> Samsung Series 9 900X4C Intel Corei5 (3.4 and later)
> HP ProBook 6475b AMD A10-4600M APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics
> Dell OptiPlex 790 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400
> 
> Detailed test status
> 
> Patches applied cleanly
> 
> dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for this
> release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No regressions in warn.

Thanks for testing all 3 of these and letting me know.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/