linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 61/62] sched: Fix hrtimer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140114002712.207028937@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:27:26 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, pjt@...gle.com,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 61/62] sched: Fix hrtimer_cancel()/rq->lock deadlock

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>

commit 927b54fccbf04207ec92f669dce6806848cbec7d upstream.

__start_cfs_bandwidth calls hrtimer_cancel while holding rq->lock,
waiting for the hrtimer to finish. However, if sched_cfs_period_timer
runs for another loop iteration, the hrtimer can attempt to take
rq->lock, resulting in deadlock.

Fix this by ensuring that cfs_b->timer_active is cleared only if the
_latest_ call to do_sched_cfs_period_timer is returning as idle. Then
__start_cfs_bandwidth can just call hrtimer_try_to_cancel and wait for
that to succeed or timer_active == 1.

Signed-off-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: pjt@...gle.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20131016181622.22647.16643.stgit@sword-of-the-dawn.mtv.corp.google.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Chris J Arges <chris.j.arges@...onical.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   15 +++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -2410,6 +2410,13 @@ static int do_sched_cfs_period_timer(str
 	if (idle)
 		goto out_unlock;
 
+	/*
+	 * if we have relooped after returning idle once, we need to update our
+	 * status as actually running, so that other cpus doing
+	 * __start_cfs_bandwidth will stop trying to cancel us.
+	 */
+	cfs_b->timer_active = 1;
+
 	__refill_cfs_bandwidth_runtime(cfs_b);
 
 	if (!throttled) {
@@ -2682,11 +2689,11 @@ void __start_cfs_bandwidth(struct cfs_ba
 	 * (timer_active==0 becomes visible before the hrtimer call-back
 	 * terminates).  In either case we ensure that it's re-programmed
 	 */
-	while (unlikely(hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer))) {
+	while (unlikely(hrtimer_active(&cfs_b->period_timer)) &&
+	       hrtimer_try_to_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer) < 0) {
+		/* bounce the lock to allow do_sched_cfs_period_timer to run */
 		raw_spin_unlock(&cfs_b->lock);
-		/* ensure cfs_b->lock is available while we wait */
-		hrtimer_cancel(&cfs_b->period_timer);
-
+		cpu_relax();
 		raw_spin_lock(&cfs_b->lock);
 		/* if someone else restarted the timer then we're done */
 		if (cfs_b->timer_active)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/