[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D4909B.7070107@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:19:23 +0800
From: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Cai Liu <cai.liu@...sung.com>, sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, liucai.lfn@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/zswap: Check all pool pages instead of one pool pages
On 01/14/2014 07:35 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 03:43:07PM +0800, Cai Liu wrote:
>> zswap can support multiple swapfiles. So we need to check
>> all zbud pool pages in zswap.
>
> True but this patch is rather costly that we should iterate
> zswap_tree[MAX_SWAPFILES] to check it. SIGH.
>
> How about defining zswap_tress as linked list instead of static
> array? Then, we could reduce unnecessary iteration too much.
>
But if use linked list, it might not easy to access the tree like this:
struct zswap_tree *tree = zswap_trees[type];
BTW: I'm still prefer to use dynamic pool size, instead of use
zswap_is_full(). AFAIR, Seth has a plan to replace the rbtree with radix
which will be more flexible to support this feature and page migration
as well.
> Other question:
> Why do we need to update zswap_pool_pages too frequently?
> As I read the code, I think it's okay to update it only when user
> want to see it by debugfs and zswap_is_full is called.
> So could we optimize it out?
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cai Liu <cai.liu@...sung.com>
Reviewed-by: Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>
>> ---
>> mm/zswap.c | 18 +++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/zswap.c b/mm/zswap.c
>> index d93afa6..2438344 100644
>> --- a/mm/zswap.c
>> +++ b/mm/zswap.c
>> @@ -291,7 +291,6 @@ static void zswap_free_entry(struct zswap_tree *tree,
>> zbud_free(tree->pool, entry->handle);
>> zswap_entry_cache_free(entry);
>> atomic_dec(&zswap_stored_pages);
>> - zswap_pool_pages = zbud_get_pool_size(tree->pool);
>> }
>>
>> /* caller must hold the tree lock */
>> @@ -405,10 +404,24 @@ cleanup:
>> /*********************************
>> * helpers
>> **********************************/
>> +static u64 get_zswap_pool_pages(void)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> + u64 pool_pages = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < MAX_SWAPFILES; i++) {
>> + if (zswap_trees[i])
>> + pool_pages += zbud_get_pool_size(zswap_trees[i]->pool);
>> + }
>> + zswap_pool_pages = pool_pages;
>> +
>> + return pool_pages;
>> +}
>> +
>> static bool zswap_is_full(void)
>> {
>> return (totalram_pages * zswap_max_pool_percent / 100 <
>> - zswap_pool_pages);
>> + get_zswap_pool_pages());
>> }
>>
>> /*********************************
>> @@ -716,7 +729,6 @@ static int zswap_frontswap_store(unsigned type, pgoff_t offset,
>>
>> /* update stats */
>> atomic_inc(&zswap_stored_pages);
>> - zswap_pool_pages = zbud_get_pool_size(tree->pool);
>>
>> return 0;
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.10.4
--
Regards,
-Bob
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists