lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1389677157-30513-13-git-send-email-namhyung@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:25:45 +0900
From:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 12/24] perf hists: Sort hist entries by accumulated period

When callchain accumulation is requested, we need to sort the entries
by accumulated period value.  When accumulated periods of two entries
are same (i.e. single path callchain) put the caller above since
accumulation tends to put callers on higher position for obvious
reason.

Cc: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
---
 tools/perf/util/hist.c | 12 ++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/hist.c b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
index 765ac5953201..da4fbec3d0d8 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/hist.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/hist.c
@@ -1063,6 +1063,18 @@ static int hist_entry__sort_on_period(struct hist_entry *a,
 	struct hist_entry *pair;
 	u64 *periods_a, *periods_b;
 
+	if (symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain) {
+		/*
+		 * Put caller above callee when they have equal period.
+		 */
+		if (a->stat_acc->period != b->stat_acc->period)
+			return a->stat_acc->period > b->stat_acc->period ? 1 : -1;
+
+		if (a->callchain->max_depth != b->callchain->max_depth)
+			return a->callchain->max_depth < b->callchain->max_depth ?
+				1 : -1;
+	}
+
 	ret = period_cmp(a->stat.period, b->stat.period);
 	if (ret || !symbol_conf.event_group)
 		return ret;
-- 
1.7.11.7

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ