[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114070711.GA4415@netboy>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 08:07:11 +0100
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] timekeeping: Rework frequency adjustments to work
better w/ nohz
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:15:18AM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
> That's great to hear! Thanks so much, I really appreciate the testing!
> And this is with HZ=?
HZ=1000
> If you do get a chance to look again, I'd also be interested if running
> with nohz=off w/ the fix doesn't show any regression compared to the
> unmodified nohz=off case.
Okay, will do.
Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists