[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114070914.GB2322@swordfish>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 10:09:14 +0300
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] zram: remove workqueue for freeing removed pending
slot
Hello Minchan,
On (01/14/14 08:38), Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hello Sergey,
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:42:56PM +0300, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > On (01/13/14 20:19), Minchan Kim wrote:
> >
> > Hello Minchan,
> > I think we need to down_write init_lock in zram_slot_free_notify(),
> > and thus can avoid locking meta->tb_lock. otherwise, I think,
>
> zram_slot_free_notify is atomic path so we couldn't hold mutex.
>
> > there is a chance that zram_slot_free_notify() can race with
> > device reset, e.g.
> >
> > zram_slot_free_notify() zram_reset_device()
> > down_write(&zram->init_lock);
> > meta = zram->meta
> > zram_meta_free(zram->meta);
> > zram->meta = NULL;
> > write_lock(&meta->tb_lock);
> > [...]
> > write_unlock(&meta->tb_lock);
> > [..]
> > up_write(&zram->init_lock);
> >
>
> Nope. We couldn't reset active device by bdev->bd_holders check
> logic in reset_store.
>
true. sorry for the noise.
-ss
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists