[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114125153.GY7572@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:51:53 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the tip
tree
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 03:53:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in
> kernel/futex.c between commit a52b89ebb6d4 ("futexes: Increase hash table
> size for better performance") from the tip tree and commit 61beee6c76e5
> ("futex: switch to USER_DS for futex test") from the akpm-current tree.
>
> @@@ -2869,10 -2748,13 +2871,13 @@@
> * implementation, the non-functional ones will return
> * -ENOSYS.
> */
> + fs = get_fs();
> + set_fs(USER_DS);
> if (cmpxchg_futex_value_locked(&curval, NULL, 0, 0) == -EFAULT)
> futex_cmpxchg_enabled = 1;
> + set_fs(fs);
>
This seems terribly broken, the *futex_value*() ops should not need
that; they are supposed to access userspace without any of that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists