| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140114131540.GB5520@krava.brq.redhat.com> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 14:15:40 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net> Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: perf probe: Build error with missing libraries On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:09:07AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > Em Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 10:41:37AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu escreveu: > > (2014/01/14 3:14), Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > > Jiri, this is something else for the give-me-more-ponies list for > > > tests/make: build it on freshly provisioned systems with multiple mixes > > > of devel packages installed ;-) > > > I think we can change makefile to get some combinations of config options > > when building perf tools. > > This is what: > > make -C tools/perf -f tests/make > > does, and we use it already, many config combos are tested, but that > kinda expects that all optional devel libs be installed. > > What I'm talking about is to, in addition, install the devel packages > iteratively, testing those config options combos with and without > installed devel packages combos. yep, sounds good.. maybe another script setting the environment (randomly, with some logic never to repeat any config?) and running tests/make suite jirka -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists