linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: thp: Add per-mm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:47:56 +0000
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
Cc:	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] mm: thp: Add per-mm_struct flag to control THP

On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 12:23:15AM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 04:01:55PM -0600, Alex Thorlton wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:23:10PM +0200, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > > Do you know what cause the difference? I prefer to fix THP instead of
> > > adding new knob to disable it.
> > 
> > The issue is that when you touch 1 byte of an untouched, contiguous 2MB
> > chunk, a THP will be handed out, and the THP will be stuck on whatever
> > node the chunk was originally referenced from.  If many remote nodes
> > need to do work on that same chunk, they'll be making remote accesses.
> > With THP disabled, 4K pages can be handed out to separate nodes as
> > they're needed, greatly reducing the amount of remote accesses to
> > memory.
> 
> I think this problem *potentially* could be fixed by NUMA balancer.
> (Although, I don't really know how balancer works...)
> 
> If we see NUMA hint faults for addresses in different 4k pages inside huge
> page from more then one node, we could split the huge page.
> 
> Mel, is it possible? Do we collect enough info to make the decision?
> 

Potentially the hinting faults can be used to decide whether to split or
not but currently there is only limited information.  You can detect if
the last faulting process was on the same node but not if the faults were
in different parts of the THP that would justify a split.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/