[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140114160444.GA4307@srcf.ucam.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:04:44 +0000
From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
To: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fcr@...net.com.uy,
"3.8+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 03:37:57PM +0800, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> The aml method _BIX of NEC LZ750/LS returns a broken package which
> skip the first member "Revision" according ACPI 5.0 spec Table 10-234.
Why don't we just ignore an invalid _BIX and fall back to _BIF? That
seems more reasonable than setting a precedent for fixing up invalid
data.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists