linux-kernel - Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode: Move to a proper location

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140114163617.GA29871@pd.tnic>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 17:36:17 +0100
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com, tglx@...utronix.de, bp@...e.de,
	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/microcode] x86, microcode: Move to a proper location

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 05:22:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Absolutely. I think moving arch/x86/kernel/cpu/ to arch/x86/cpu/
> would be a first good step. It's all kernel code, there's other
> subdirectories there that are kernel code ('pci/', 'platform/', etc.),
> so there's little point in continuing the historic accident of a
> 'kernel/' subdirectory.
>
> Once that is done we can move certain things outside as well - for
> example arch/x86/cpu/perf/ could probably move to arch/x86/events/,
> because that code is not about CPU events anymore either.

All fine and dandy with me, but I'd prefer to do this after the merge
window, i.e. for 3.15. Rushing it now would just cause unnecessary
trouble IMO.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/