[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFECyb_EoHQSLaRcr1W0ScpnGTAS9UT0jN8DNsSELqYrLqCcNA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 11:39:40 -0800
From: Roy Franz <roy.franz@...aro.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Leif Lindholm <leif.lindholm@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@....com>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 0/8] Add ARM EFI stub
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan, at 08:30:09AM, Roy Franz wrote:
>> This patch series adds EFI stub support for the ARM architecture. The
>> stub for ARM is implemented in a similar manner to x86 in that it is a
>> shim layer between EFI and the normal zImage/bzImage boot process, and
>> that an image with the stub configured is bootable as both a zImage and
>> EFI application. This patchset adds common code that is shared with
>> the ARM64 EFI stub.
>>
>> This patch depends on Leif Lindholm's ARM v7 runtime services patchset, which
>> in turn depends on Mark Salter's early_io_remap() patchset. This EFI stub
>> patchset can be tested without those by simply modifying the Kconfig for
>> EFI_STUB to not depend on EFI. The kernel will boot using the stub,
>> however no EFI support will be available in the kernel.
>>
>> I have addressed all the feedback I have recieved to date, and I am hoping
>> that this patchset is acceptable for merging into 3.14. It has been
>> functionally stable for some time, and provides useful functionality.
>> Further consolidation of the ARM/ARM64 stubs planned as part of the
>> ongoing development of the stubs and supporting tools for both
>> architectures (getting the FDT from a UEFI configuration table, using UEFI
>> memory map instead of FDT for memory description.)
>
> Is this going to Linus via one of the ARM maintainer trees?
>
> --
> Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Hi Matt,
Yes, this is planned to go through one of the ARM trees. Given
that this relies on the early_io_remap
patchsets that have not been accepted yet, I don't see this being
accepted for 3.14.
Roy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists