lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 14 Jan 2014 15:44:46 -0500
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mm: make creation of the mm_kobj happen earlier than device_initcall

The use of __initcall is to be eventually replaced by choosing
one from the prioritized groupings laid out in init.h header:

	pure_initcall               0
	core_initcall               1
	postcore_initcall           2
	arch_initcall               3
	subsys_initcall             4
	fs_initcall                 5
	device_initcall             6
	late_initcall               7

In the interim, all __initcall are mapped onto device_initcall,
which as can be seen above, comes quite late in the ordering.

Currently the mm_kobj is created with __initcall in mm_sysfs_init().
This means that any other initcalls that want to reference the
mm_kobj have to be device_initcall (or later), otherwise we will
for example, trip the BUG_ON(!kobj) in sysfs's internal_create_group().
This unfairly restricts those users; for example something that clearly
makes sense to be an arch_initcall will not be able to choose that.

However, upon examination, it is only this way for historical
reasons (i.e. simply not reprioritized yet).  We see that sysfs is
ready quite earlier in init/main.c via:

 vfs_caches_init
 |_ mnt_init
    |_ sysfs_init

well ahead of the processing of the prioritized calls listed above.

So we can recategorize mm_sysfs_init to be a pure_initcall, which
in turn allows any mm_kobj initcall users a wider range (1 --> 7)
of initcall priorities to choose from.

Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
---
 mm/mm_init.c | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c
index 68562e92d50c..857a6434e3a5 100644
--- a/mm/mm_init.c
+++ b/mm/mm_init.c
@@ -202,5 +202,4 @@ static int __init mm_sysfs_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 }
-
-__initcall(mm_sysfs_init);
+pure_initcall(mm_sysfs_init);
-- 
1.8.5.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ