[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D5B23F.3080807@codeaurora.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2014 13:55:11 -0800
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@...eaurora.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] Krait L1/L2 EDAC driver
On 01/14/14 13:48, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 01:30:30PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> This patchset adds support for the Krait L1/L2 cache error detection
>> hardware. The first patch adds the Krait l2 indirection
>> register code. This patch is in need of an ACK from ARM folks.
>> The next two patches add the driver and the binding and
>> the final patch hooks it all up by adding the device tree node.
>>
>> I think Boris will pick up the first and third patches since they depend
>> on each other. The final dts change could go through arm-soc via davidb's tree
>> and the Documentation patch could go through the devicetree tree. Or patches 1
>> through 3 can go through Boris' tree.
>>
>> Changes since v4:
>> * Prefixed l2 accessors functions with krait_
>> * Dropped first two patches as Boris says he picked them up
> Hey Stephen,
>
> I'm going to send upstream only
>
> [PATCH v4 1/6] edac: Don't try to cancel workqueue when it's never setup
>
> as it is a clear bugfix.
>
> The second one
>
> [PATCH v4 2/6] genirq: export percpu irq functions for module usage
>
> will have to wait for when the driver goes in. But the driver depends on
> "ARM: Add Krait L2 register accessor functions" which still waits for
> ACKs, right?
>
Ok that sounds fine. The ARM patch is fairly minor so I'm not sure if
anyone is willing to ack it, but I'm willing to wait a little while to
see if anyone will.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists