linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140115163055.24e2bae2@notabene.brown>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 16:30:55 +1100
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the md tree with the block tree

On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 15:07:43 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
wrote:

> Hi Neil,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the md tree got a conflict in
> drivers/md/raid10.c between commit 4f024f3797c4 ("block: Abstract out
> bvec iterator") from the block tree and commit b50c259e25d9 ("md/raid10:
> fix two bugs in handling of known-bad-blocks") from the md tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
> 

Thanks Stephen.
Those md fixes are now on their way to Linus (I'm hoping for 3.13 inclusion,
I might be lucky).  Good they they are easy to resolve!

Thanks,
NeilBrown

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)