[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52D62814.2000401@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 00:17:56 -0600
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
CC: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, lenb@...nel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
fcr@...net.com.uy, l@...ileo.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ACPI/Battery: Add a _BIX quirk for NEC LZ750/LS
On 01/14/2014 03:37 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 04:06:01 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 06, 2014 at 11:25:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>
>>> Queued up as a fix for 3.13 (I fixed up the indentation).
>>
>> Ah, sorry, I missed this chunk of the thread. If the system provides
>> valid _BIF data then we should possibly just fall back to that rather
>> than adding another quirk table.
>
> The problem is to know that _BIX is broken. If we could figure that out
> upfront, we woulnd't need the quirk table in any case.
>
> Tianyu, can we do some effort during the driver initialization to detect
> this breakage and handle it without blacklisting systems?
Yes, the usual question in such cases is "how does Windows manage to
function on such systems, (almost certainly) without a system-specific
hack, and can we replicate that behavior?"
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists