linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3.1 11/21] ARM: pxa: support ICP DAS LP-8x4x FPGA irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACRpkdaA_HBcRgBj9+x_RJquSnvy-r7Wqp-z=ZnoGaCBy+wamw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 08:46:47 +0100
From:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To:	Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND..." <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 11/21] ARM: pxa: support ICP DAS LP-8x4x FPGA irq

This is looking much better!

On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 12:07 AM, Sergei Ianovich <ynvich@...il.com> wrote:

> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-lp8x4x.c
(...)

You could add some kerneldoc to this following struct (OK nitpick, but
still nice, especially for the last two variables).

> +struct lp8x4x_irq_data {
> +       void                    *base;
> +       struct irq_domain       *domain;
> +       unsigned long           num_irq;
> +       unsigned char           irq_sys_enabled;
> +       unsigned char           irq_high_enabled;
> +};
> +
> +static void lp8x4x_mask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +       unsigned mask;
> +       unsigned long irq = d->hwirq;

Name the local variable hwirq too so we know what it is.

> +       struct lp8x4x_irq_data *host = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> +       if (!host) {
> +               pr_err("lp8x4x: missing host data for irq %i\n", d->irq);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (irq >= host->num_irq) {
> +               pr_err("lp8x4x: wrong irq handler for irq %i\n", d->irq);
> +               return;
> +       }

This is on the hotpath. Do you *really* need these two checks?

(...)
> +static void lp8x4x_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
> +{
> +       unsigned mask;
> +       unsigned long irq = d->hwirq;

Name the variable "hwirq".

> +       struct lp8x4x_irq_data *host = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
> +
> +       if (!host) {
> +               pr_err("lp8x4x: missing host data for irq %i\n", d->irq);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (irq >= host->num_irq) {
> +               pr_err("lp8x4x: wrong irq handler for irq %i\n", d->irq);
> +               return;
> +       }

Again overzealous error checks.

(...)
> +static void lp8x4x_irq_handler(unsigned int irq, struct irq_desc *desc)
> +{
> +       int n;
> +       unsigned long mask;
> +       struct irq_chip *chip = irq_desc_get_chip(desc);
> +       struct lp8x4x_irq_data *host = irq_desc_get_handler_data(desc);
> +
> +       if (!host)
> +               return;

I don't think this happens either?

> +       chained_irq_enter(chip, desc);
> +
> +       for (;;) {
> +               mask = ioread8(host->base + CLRHILVINT) & 0xff;
> +               mask |= (ioread8(host->base + SECOINT) & SECOINT_MASK) << 8;
> +               mask |= (ioread8(host->base + PRIMINT) & PRIMINT_MASK) << 8;
> +               mask &= host->irq_high_enabled | (host->irq_sys_enabled << 8);
> +               if (mask == 0)
> +                       break;
> +               for_each_set_bit(n, &mask, BITS_PER_LONG)
> +                       generic_handle_irq(irq_find_mapping(host->domain, n));
> +       }

I like the looks of this.

If you fix this:
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>

Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/