linux-kernel - [PATCHv2 2/4] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1389780977-18949-3-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 13:16:15 +0300
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCHv2 2/4] zram: do not pass rw argument to __zram_make_request()

Do not pass rw argument down the __zram_make_request() -> zram_bvec_rw()
chain, decode it in zram_bvec_rw() instead. Besides, this is the place
where we distinguish READ and WRITE bio data directions, so account zram
RW stats here, instead of __zram_make_request(). This also allows to account
a real number of zram READ/WRITE operations, not just requests (single RW
request may cause a number of zram RW ops with separate locking,
compression/decompression, etc).

v2: do not check for READA return code. noted by Jerome Marchand.

Acked-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
---
 drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
index c323e05..b0bcb7e 100644
--- a/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/block/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -533,14 +533,18 @@ out:
 }
 
 static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
-			int offset, struct bio *bio, int rw)
+			int offset, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	int ret;
+	int rw = bio_data_dir(bio);
 
-	if (rw == READ)
+	if (rw == READ) {
+		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_reads);
 		ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio);
-	else
+	} else {
+		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_writes);
 		ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset);
+	}
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -670,22 +674,13 @@ out:
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio, int rw)
+static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio)
 {
 	int offset;
 	u32 index;
 	struct bio_vec bvec;
 	struct bvec_iter iter;
 
-	switch (rw) {
-	case READ:
-		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_reads);
-		break;
-	case WRITE:
-		atomic64_inc(&zram->stats.num_writes);
-		break;
-	}
-
 	index = bio->bi_iter.bi_sector >> SECTORS_PER_PAGE_SHIFT;
 	offset = (bio->bi_iter.bi_sector &
 		  (SECTORS_PER_PAGE - 1)) << SECTOR_SHIFT;
@@ -704,16 +699,15 @@ static void __zram_make_request(struct zram *zram, struct bio *bio, int rw)
 			bv.bv_len = max_transfer_size;
 			bv.bv_offset = bvec.bv_offset;
 
-			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio, rw) < 0)
+			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index, offset, bio) < 0)
 				goto out;
 
 			bv.bv_len = bvec.bv_len - max_transfer_size;
 			bv.bv_offset += max_transfer_size;
-			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index+1, 0, bio, rw) < 0)
+			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bv, index + 1, 0, bio) < 0)
 				goto out;
 		} else
-			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bvec, index, offset, bio, rw)
-			    < 0)
+			if (zram_bvec_rw(zram, &bvec, index, offset, bio) < 0)
 				goto out;
 
 		update_position(&index, &offset, &bvec);
@@ -743,7 +737,7 @@ static void zram_make_request(struct request_queue *queue, struct bio *bio)
 		goto error;
 	}
 
-	__zram_make_request(zram, bio, bio_data_dir(bio));
+	__zram_make_request(zram, bio);
 	up_read(&zram->init_lock);
 
 	return;
-- 
1.8.5.3.493.gb139ac2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/