linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Rework rx_work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:37:07 +0000
From:	Wei Liu <wei.liu2@...rix.com>
To:	Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
CC:	<ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
	<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] xen-netback: Rework rx_work_todo

On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 07:28:39PM +0000, Zoltan Kiss wrote:
> The recent patch to fix receive side flow control (11b57f) solved the spinning
> thread problem, however caused an another one. The receive side can stall, if:
> - xenvif_rx_action sets rx_queue_stopped to false
> - interrupt happens, and sets rx_event to true
> - then xenvif_kthread sets rx_event to false
> 

If you mean "rx_work_todo" returns false.

In this case

(!skb_queue_empty(&vif->rx_queue) && !vif->rx_queue_stopped) || vif->rx_event;

can still be true, can't it?

> Also, through rx_event a malicious guest can force the RX thread to spin. This
> patch ditch that two variable, and rework rx_work_todo. If the thread finds it

This seems to be a bigger problem. Can you elaborate?

Wei.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/