linux-kernel - Re: Atmel updates to atmel_mxt_ts touch controller driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52D66699.8020309@itdev.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:44:41 +0000
From:	Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>
To:	Yufeng Shen <miletus@...omium.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
CC:	Henrik Rydberg <rydberg@...omail.se>,
	Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
	Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@...sung.com>,
	Alan Bowens <Alan.Bowens@...el.com>,
	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Meerwald <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
	Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olofj@...omium.org>, adlr@...omium.org
Subject: Re: Atmel updates to atmel_mxt_ts touch controller driver - v6

Yufeng Shen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Nick Dyer <nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk
> <mailto:nick.dyer@...ev.co.uk>> wrote:
>> Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
>> > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 04:55:57PM +0100, Nick Dyer wrote:
>> >> rydberg@...omail.se <mailto:rydberg@...omail.se> wrote:
>> >>> First: thanks for the patches and you work on this driver.
>> >>
>> >> Thank you for your time in looking at these changes.
>> >>
>> >>> Now, I don't swear much, but I would like to emphasize line 161 of
>> >>> Documentation/SubmittingPatches:
>> >>>
>> >>> **Do not send more than 15 patches at once to the vger mailing
> lists!!!***
>> >>>
>> >>> One reason that should be obvious by now is that your work will be
>> >>> attended to much quicker. One may think that it is more efficient to
>> >>> send the whole backlog at once, but in fact, the time it takes to get
>> >>> a patchset accepted is inversely proportional to the length of the
>> >>> patchset. So please, keep it small and simple next time,
>> >>
>> >> Apologies. I will split this lot up into several smaller series of
> patches.
>> >
>> > Wait, I am in the process of applying it actually...
>>
>> I wonder, have you made any progress with this? Is there any way I can
>> assist?
>
> Hey Dimitry,
> 
> What's the status on this ?
> 
> I noticed that at  /pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input, branch
> atmel-mxt-ts has part of Nick's patches applied
> but not all. The upstream tree and Nick's tree
>  https://github.com/ndyer/linux/commits/for-next are still
> significantly diverged.
> 
> I am wondering any plan on your side to apply more patches that sent out by
> Nick ?
> 
> We (Chromium authors) are planning on bringing our local tree of atmel
> driver to be as close as possible to
> upstream and trying to figure out what's the best tree to rebase against.

I was considering picking up the patches that Dimitry has already reviewed
and rebasing them against the current mainline to try and get things moving
again - would that be useful?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/