[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389783998.14001.22.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 03:06:38 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>,
linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next 2/2] bcache: Use max_t() when comparing different
types
On Wed, 2014-01-15 at 10:06 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function ‘insert_u64s_remaining’:
> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1816: warning: comparison of distinct pointer types lacks a cast
[]
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
[]
> @@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static size_t insert_u64s_remaining(struct btree *b)
> if (b->keys.ops->is_extents)
> ret -= KEY_MAX_U64S;
>
> - return max(ret, 0L);
> + return max_t(ssize_t, ret, 0L);
why not
return max(ret, 0);
I think it odd that:
drivers/md/bcache/bset.h:static inline size_t bch_btree_keys_u64s_remaining(struct btree_keys *b)
and:
static size_t insert_u64s_remaining(struct btree *b)
{
ssize_t ret = bch_btree_keys_u64s_remaining(&b->keys);
/*
* Might land in the middle of an existing extent and have to split it
*/
if (b->keys.ops->is_extents)
ret -= KEY_MAX_U64S;
return max(ret, 0L);
}
so the only use of that size_t inline is cast to ssize_t
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists