[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1389748603.2336.9.camel@rzhang1-mobl4>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 09:16:43 +0800
From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] fix module autoloading for ACPI enumerated devices
On Tue, 2014-01-14 at 14:41 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 04:00:17PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 17:35 +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 09:48:31PM +0800, Zhang Rui wrote:
> > > > ACPI enumerated devices has ACPI style _HID and _CID strings,
> > > > all of these strings can be used for both driver loading and matching.
>
> > If this piece of code is used in an *SPI* driver for an ACPI enumerated
> > spi device, the spi driver module_alias is "acpi:INTABCD", but
> > the uevent of its spi device node is
> > "spi:INTABCD" (PREFIX:spi_device->modalias).
>
> OK that makes sense, but what does this have to do with the _HID and
> _CID methods?
If an ACPI enumerated SPI device has a _HID and a _CID,
both of them need to be exposed in 'uevent', so that a driver that
matches _CID can also have a chance to be probed. This can not be done
by the current code, thus we need special handling of ACPI enumerated
SPI devices.
> Surely we're just replacing spi: with acpi: in the uevent?
yes.
thanks,
rui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists